Saturday, August 30, 2008

A Democrat Can Win in Barry County

The history of government in Barry County is riddled with incompetence. All one has to do, is read back issues of the local newspaper for the last few years to see a pattern of government mismanagement, and malfeasance. These incidents seem to have one thing in common:

"Republicans"

An inbred local culture of politicians that do nothing better with our tax dollars than fight for who gets to live on the taxpayers dime first. Many without a clue as to how to perform their jobs effectively. From arguments against the old boy network in the not too distant past, to recent allegations against the former director of 911 last year, Charlton Park, gun rights battles in the streets of Hastings, and allegations of sexism in city hall.

The mismanagement of our area mirrors what has been happening at the state level, and in Washington, D.C. . Corporate lobbyists, and incompetent partisans placed in bureaucratic jobs fulfilling agendas that in no way mirror the wants, and needs of constituents. These people are so busy scratching each others backs, they seem to have forgotten their intended duties. Many seem to believe that their singular duty is getting elected.

Now please don't lump me in with the pessimists. I will not call for throwing all of the bums out here. Such rhetoric has only helped divide our nation, rather than mobilize voters to help complete the change that is needed.
Besides, there are no competitive parties that have ponied up alternatives in this county.

No Independent party members,
No Greens,
No Libertarians,
and most sadly of all, no Democrats.

Much has been made of whether or not a Democrat can win in Barry County. I think this is the wrong question. I'd ask why won't decent Democrats run in Barry County. I think the answer is that the local party has been a complete and utter failure, and that they fear the voters wouldn't listen anyway. There's also been a deliberate misinformation campaign that suggests Democrats have never won and can never win in the future. This is bull.

National polls have hinted for some time at a solid Democratic majority in Washington next January. Democrats could potentially take the State Senate and be in control in Lansing. And yet the local Democratic Party has failed to take advantage of this potential landslide and get warm bodies to fill up empty ballot slots. Not one Democrat ran for County Commission.

While many still walk around with the cartoon image of the 1960s Democratic Party in their minds, the truth is that the radical party in this country is the Republican Party. The Republican party is an echo chamber full of many supposed civil servants who have perfected the art of "group think". Positions filled (from cabinet positions all the way down to secretarial duties at local levels), have been done in such a way that only those that could pass the most stringent of purity tests need apply. Even here on these very web pages, many candidates are called out for being RINO (Republican in name only) candidates, and mocked for not putting party above principal, and contributing time, and money to sell agendas they may not completely agree with. The Republican party's "big tent" seems to shrink aggressively with every election cycle. Many would have attempted to throw their own presidential nominee to the curb, had he not towed the line in choosing his "politically acceptable" (god forbid) replacement if something should happen.

The Democratic Party since the defeat of Jimmy Carter has been moving closer and closer to the middle, in fact Carter himself was a centrist who defeated the more liberal Teddy Kennedy. While many swallowed the Rush Limbaugh hype about President Clinton, Clinton was an avowed centrist who favored market solutions over governments. He enacted welfare reforms, and other measures that were more akin to the traditional Republican platform than the Democratic Party's. All the while leading his party into a more progressive position.

Despite the fact that many Democrats wanted to see a hard leftward swing after 7 years of George W. Bush's far right governance, Barack Obama won his party's nomination with talk of conciliation and compromise. Now, the country stands poised to elect a Democratic Congress and Senate and Obama's prospects in November look decent. His promise of more responsive government is rooted in the idea that the president needs to take council from all sides of the political spectrum, in contrast to that of our present administration which asks for reverberation rather than option.

We have already seen the effects brought on by one party's incestuous government control. We've seen already the effects of smaller, meaner government, having too much power, in Washington, and right here in Barry County. We have seen the loss of employers, as well as that of job security here. Everyone is feeling the pinch of the economic disaster that was bred in Washington D.C.. Make no mistake, many of the Republicans in this county have fully supported the president, and his administrations actions that have lead to the problems we are facing.

Change can happen here, as well as in the nations capitol.

A Democrat Can Win in Barry County.


But in order for this to happen, we need more competent Democrats to run in Barry county, and give the voters a reason to believe that they can make a difference.
Democrats need to fight the battle for the people here, in order to ensure that they can do the same in the capitol. Republicans built their following from the bottom up, and the Democrats need to do the same. Democratic candidates cannot afford to be the fall back vote, or the angry protest vote, they must be the only logical vote. For this to happen there needs to be a ballot full of Democrats.

15 comments:

RMGN! said...

http://www.wbrn.com/page.php?page_id=4023

RMGN gets SC hearing
The Reform Michigan Government Now! campaign is getting a second chance. The state’s high court has agreed to hold hearings on the proposal that would change 13 percent of the constitution. The Supreme Court will hear arguments on September 3 to decide if the measure will be on ballots in November. The appeal was filed by RMGN following the ruling by the state appellate court that the proposal was unconstitutional. The court said a general revision of the state constitution could only be done with a constitutional convention called by voters.

We plan on a protest at the Michigan Supreme Court around 9am on Wednesday. Bring your signs.

RMGN! said...

The Michigan Supreme Court has agreed to hear our case to overturn the Court of Appeals decision which denied Michigander’s their right to vote on our government reform proposal in November. The hearing date is Wednesday, September 3 at 9:30am at the Michigan Supreme Court in Lansing. http://courts.michigan.gov/SUPREMECOURT/DrivingDirections.htm

We need as many people as possible outside the court, picketing with protest signs. With such short notice, I do not know what to expect as far as turnout. Around 8:45 is a good time to get organized.

Activist jurists are denying you your right to decide this issue. We’ve argued to let the people decide. That is what it all boils down to. www.reformmichigangovernmentnow.com

In the meantime, we immediately need everyone to write a brief letter to an editor, even your local paper if it can be published by Wednesday. Otherwise, our only options are the state daily papers. http://newslink.org/minews.html or http://www.usnpl.com/minews.php

Blog it too. Keep it clean, keep it non-partisan no matter what blog you are in. Don't be surprised to be attacked afterwards in the blogs. It seems those that scream the most to protect rights are quickly willing to let the state courts steal one of their very basic rights, the people's right to a petition initiative.

Whether blogging or writing letters to the editor, stay on message. RMGN complied with state law and our constitution to meet all of the requirements for a petition initiative. We gathered nearly 500,000 signatures from people around the state, summarized the wording to appear on the ballot to the satisfaction of the State Bureau of Elections, and the Bureau of Elections recommended the Secretary of State allow our proposal to be placed on November's ballot. The State Court of Appeals issued an immediate cease and desist order to the State Board of Canvassers stopping them from a sure affirmative vote which would have allowed the Secretary of State to begin printing up voting ballots with our ballot proposal on it. It's time to let the people decide.

Our drop-dead date for the State Secretary of State is Sept. 5. The Supreme Court has taken us right to the limit. The time to protect your right is NOW.

Joe Lukasiewicz

The Last Boy Scout said...

The put the Democrats in control proposal will fail. It is BAD law. It will destroy Michigan! If you think unemployment is high now under a do nothing Democrat Governor, wait till the whole state is under the Democrats control. Are we shooting for double digit unemployment? If this passes would the last person out of Michigan please turn out the lights!

el grillo said...

The Boy Scout is right again, as usual. We need to recall Granholm, who is responsible for this mess and bring back John Engler who provided us with a huge surplus and almost had the builders of gas guzzlers back to work before she stole the election from the western shore.
No need to turn out the lights. John took them with him. We're still looking for a candle.

el grillo said...

PW/Agno;
Tell us about when the County Board was all Democrats.

The Last Boy Scout said...

Never said Engler was without sin, Granholm has followed in his footsteps with out of control spending. I don't remember anyone holding a gun to Her head and forcing Her to rin for Governor. She knew what she was getting into. I haven't seen any cuts in spending, the Budget keeps getting bigger every year and you can't blame that on the Republicans.

el grillo said...

Blame is for playgrounds. Adults consider ideas.

Pol Watcher said...

"I haven't seen any cuts in spending"

I guess when you shut your eyes you don't see what you don't want to see. Try looking. Spending cuts have been a part of every budget since Granholm took office.

el grillo said...

PW,
Name one for us.
gracias

Patti said...

Repugs under Engler's rule left the state in a mess. A mess that Governor Granholm inherited. To blame the governor for the poor Michigan economy is baby talk.

Grow up and write something intelligent.

el grillo said...

On second thought, the thread isn't about any of this.

Pol Watcher said...

I assume everyone who can post to a blog knows how to use The Google, but for those who want to pretend like it's hard to find the answer I'd suggest entering "Michigan spending cuts."

If you did that you might find that in 2007: "the budget also includes $430 million in cuts and savings."
OR:
"Governor Granholm has also cut spending instead of raising taxes. In her first year in office, Granholm slashed $1.5 billion to balance Michigan's budget. Even sacred cows like state-employee compensation and education funding were not spared. Adult education was cut by 74 percent, arts project funding by 50 percent, and even public school funding by 1 percent."

or...

"Over the last five years, investment in higher education has been cut more dramatically
than any time in recent memory. Real per student state appropriations to universities
have been slashed by 20 to 40 percent, depending on the university."


finally...

"But since 2000, Michigan has steadily cut taxes – and investment in universities. Today, state government spending is about 7.5 percent of Michigan’s personal income – $5 billion less than allowed under the Headlee constitutional spending limit. Tuition is up. We are losing the battle for the best research talent. And our universities are battling to maintain the laboratories and facilities needed to prepare students for tomorrow’s jobs. Some of our political leaders say tax cuts are needed to make the state “more competitive,”
because, they contend, we are a high tax state. That’s just not true. Michigan’s 2005 total state and local tax burden, according to the Tax Foundation, a non-partisan tax research organization based in Washington, D.C., is 10.2 percent,
ranking it 21st in the nation, in the middle of the pack.
What states are below us? Mississippi. South Carolina. Alabama, Arkansas. Which states are well above us? New York, Massachusetts, Minnesota, California. No question which are the economic powerhouses."


I rest my case.

el grillo said...

Excellent!
gracias.

Jay said...

Back to the original topic...

I blame the local Dems own fractious nature for their failures in Barry County. We have two Democrat organizations that cannot/will not work together. The main Dems put on ok forums, and the progressives are a movie club, but they can never come together and raise the money or do the work that is needed to win.

The Republicans have suffered from their own squabbles, however #1: In the larger races that mattered they were united and, #2 They have benefited from established voting habits.

This blog has consistently looked down upon the hinterland and suburbs of Barry County as a scene out of Dogpatch USA. It has looked down upon those that hold to their pro-life or pro-gun beliefs. For Democrats (and "Easter/Christmas Republicans") to run candidates that cannot find common ground with the majority of this group is suicide.


A Democrat can win this county, but this person must have the united support of Democrats, and must appeal to some degree outside the Dems traditional pockets. That means being more conservative on the guns and/or life issues. I have seen many a qualified Democrat run up against a brick wall in this county. Until the BC Democrats get their act together and be more of a party than a debating society (or video club), another one will hit the wall in 2008.

el grillo said...

Jay says:
"to run candidates that cannot find common ground with the majority of this group (those that hold to their pro-life or pro-gun beliefs) is suicide."

You have replaced "Garfield" as my favorite comic.

If the Pro-War fanatics win this election, my plan B residency in Costa Rica will have been a brilliant choice. Those who presume that the USA is a safer place because they are blinded from the truth, remind me of the silly people who hunkered down in Galveston, ignoring the "mandatory evacuation", and are now sitting on their porches with their hands out.
The difference is that the destruction of the USA will not result in some welfare handout.

The corporations palling the GWBII & GWBIII strings are not in the USA. While they may have storefront offices here, the majority stockholders are beyond our oceans. (ie. Dutch Royal Shell, British Petroleum, Toyota, Dubai, etc)
While Sarah may be able to see Russia from her porch, she apparently can't see all the way to China where most of our Treasury Bills are stored.