Thursday, September 07, 2006

Insist on easier elections

The Counterculture in the 1960s used to like to say that “If voting really made a difference, they wouldn’t let you do it.” Those words have been haunting me lately, in the wake of the Aug. 8 primary election and in the wake of some hard thinking about recycling. So what do voting and recycling have in common? Let me explain.

I noticed Barry County finally is going to attempt to encourage people to do the right thing with a voluntary curbside recycling program, something that’s been long overdue around here. The best way to get people to do the right thing is either make it convenient for them or penalize them if they don’t (see: seat belt use in automobiles). If people can set their recyclable materials out on the curb for pickup just like they do for garbage, a far greater number will take part in the process to reduce solid waste. I’m not ashamed to tell everyone I think it’s a good thing.

Hastings about 15 years had a group of high school students present a proposal for curbside recycling to the City Council, but it was shot down because the teens forgot to stroke the inflated ego of No. 1 Barry County blowhard Dr. V. Harry Adrounie, who showed up at a subsequent meeting half in the bag (this, according to an impeccable source) to admonish the kids for not going through the proper channels by asking him first. But now, thanks to Mark Doster and Don Boysen, citizens in Thornapple Township are the first in Barry County to try out a voluntary program that will cost them $25 a year.

Now, for the voting. If we can make it easier for people to vote, I think they’ll do it in larger numbers than they currently do. After almost all elections almost everywhere, the area newspapers are inundated with letters to the editor decrying the low numbers at the polls, like 23% in Barry County’s Aug. 8 primary, the highest in this area. What seems to be overlooked is that in today’s modern society, with both Mom and Dad working outside the home, there’s little time you can set aside for going to the polls.

Most elections are held on Tuesdays, which customarily are work days. Most folks these days are working or traveling to and from work in the hours between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. With the polls open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., that leaves only one hour in the morning and two hours in the evening as a reasonable window of opportunity. And don’t forget Junior’s soccer practice and Molly’s clarinet lessons, not to mention somehow finding enough time to make and gather to eat dinner together.

What I’m saying is that it’s becoming increasingly difficult for ordinary workaday Americans to set aside time to exercise their right to vote. And if voting is inconvenient and perhaps even a hassle for many, why should they bother, no matter what we political freaks say about its importance? We need to make it easier for the masses of ordinary Americans to do it. Resistance, or the infamous process known as “that’s the way we’ve always done it,” these days almost sounds like the political party in power, the GOP, doesn’t really want the unwashed masses to vote, so let’s keep making it inconvenient, let’s just keep things the way they are so the priviledged and powerful will have even more control over the process. I say we must find a way to try mail-in voting or even Internet voting as a way for citizens to fill out their ballot selections in the privacy and comfort of their own homes.

I’m already hearing the objections. Some warn of the dangers of fraud, yet few dispute sending their money via the mail or over the Internet- in fact, the system we have already sends vote total via Internet to a central database to be tabulated- I have my concerns about the system now in use but the fact is that it can be done in a way that provides safeguards and offers alternate methods for vote counting to ensure no fraud or theft is committed. We have seen in several recent elections problems with the current system and yet the status quo prevails- and when changes are made they just seem to be a way of throwing big contracts to campaign contributors. With anything there is a certain amount of risk. We just have to have the courage and will to change and the wisdom to do it right.

Another contrary comment is that anyone these days can get an absentee ballot and send it in. But that involves bureaucratic hassles and puts the onus on the citizen rather than forcing the government to provide a service by making the ballots readily and easily available to the people. Also, current events have a way of changing political reality- those that vote weeks in advance via USPS may not be able to change their vote if last minute news happens that alters the dyanamic of the race.

As long as we keep voting the same way our ancestors did 200 years ago, we’re going to continue to see declining numbers, because it’s just not as easy as it used to be to set aside time to go to the polls, stand in line and do your duty. We make it more convenient these days for people to pay their taxes (on line or by mail), more convenient to buy license plates and easier to have all kinds of important interactions with government, many of us do our banking online or shop for Christmas presents, but somehow we don’t want to change the voting system to accommodate modern realities. Casting a ballot for elected office should be as simple and quick as ordering a meal at a fast food restaurant or buying a book from Amazon.com- American citizens are used to fast and efficient service and our government should respond my making elections run more smoothly and efficiently.

There are many other needed and effective changes that can be made to our current election and voting systems and schemes- online voting is but a start, but one that would have instant dividends by increasing interest and turnout in elections especially in younger generations which are woefully under-represented in the current political process. I also think we need to look at instant runoff voting and proportional representation as ways to increase the small "d" democracy in our big "D" Democracy. We must push our elected leaders to alter the system that got them into office which is something that not many of them are eager to do.

Let’s not let the powers that be pull what Harry Adrounie did on those high school kids, let’s insist on curbside recycling and homeside voting. Let’s tell Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land and all city, county and village clerks what the late Ward Weiler used to tell the County Board: “You work for us, not the other way around.”

11 comments:

truthfulpat said...

Yes, next redistricting the House so all districts lie withing one of Michigan's 15 Congressional Districts for some sense of continuity. The number of State reps can be anywhere from 3 to 6...

Term limits out.
Limit the number of session days and pay only a per diem.

Since they vote electronically, there is no need for the legislators to meet physically. The entire process can be done in virtual reality, a web site open to the public with live time video avaiable to everyone to view. The citizen Legistator who cannot spend their time in Lansing need not go there at all. Split screens can easily make it possible for the citizens to view all sessions and committee meetings and any other meetings will be a felony.

Pay must be limited to per diems and they can be limited so that when the per diem ends, so does the legislative session.

Jay said...

Pol: Studies have shown that Saturday voting doesn't get the people out, weekdays are better. With early/postal voting, there would be an additional cost to the taxpayer. Proportial and run-off voting doesn't work in this country ouside of city elections, and it does nothing to increase turnout.


Your right that results are sent to the state on-line, but that is a dedicated system with very controlled access.

I pretty much advocate "no reason absentee", which means that one submits the application and then gets an absentee ballot.

Arizona has a proposal on the ballot to enter every voter who votes into a yearly lottery drawing for a million dollars. I have trouble with this type of "reward" for civic responsibility.

Yes folks have busy lives, but voting is a civic responsibility. If they cannot take time out of their busy lives to go to the polling place, they can vote absentee. Many in these parts only vote every four years in November and that's it. It's there choice. Pesonal responsibility is inherent in the Jeffersonian election model. How easy should we make it? If we were to extend your arguement, all decisions would eventually be made by an American Idol-style call in system. Press 1 for mob rule.

agnosticrat said...

I'm way too busy to give you my opinion on this subject right now!
Could you maybe ask me on saturday, or mail me with a form or something? I'll send it in when I have time. Maybe if you were on the internet and I could just push a button! Gotta go, time for Big Brother.
Honestly, if you don't vote, it is likely I don't want you to.

Jay said...

Ladies and Gentlemen:
Post-primary campaign statements have come in ....the State Rep-elect, Brian Calley spent the most in the Primary at $52,216.65 (he raised $53,005.57). As expected, the flood of PAC contributions came in after the election from those PACs that didn't endorse in the Primary. Calley even got a contribution from one of the heads of 23 is Enough ($30), the anti-Gun Lake casino outfit. Calley was left with $788.92 (as of the end of August) to challenge Kalnbach. I think Calley can easily replenish his coffers to mount a suitable challenge.

Here's how the rest stacked up: Bailey (doing a screwy job of reporting--will likely get fined again) spent $37,000. Susan spent $31,463.68. Reynolds spent a little over $12,000. Lower and Trombley have yet to file. Doster didn't have to file because he had a waiver saying he spent/collected under $1000.

-------
And Scrotie: Some days I tend to agree with you.

agnosticrat said...

On internet voting:
Forgetting for the moment that security would likely be more of an issue, I would also like to purpose that it would be a further foot in the door to those that would like the government to have more control of its content.

Furture neocon speech material:
...In these dark days of terror you wouldn't want people to have the ability to post "unapproved content" on the very means by wich we decide the fate of the nation would you?
"Terrorists" or "terrorist appeasers" could have an influence on the outcome of elections if given the chance to voice opinion on a website that was mistakenly accessed by god fearing americans. Not to mention the attack on christian values when unsuspecting voters would likely type in the wrong url and are accosted with impure pornagraphic material! You might just as well let Markos Moulitsas raise your children! No sir, this will not stand! I vote we control the internet and all of its content in the name of peace!
Hell Clinton had a chance to shut down the bloggers, but he didn't even try!...
But then again I could be wrong. I thought we would get bogged down in Iraq.

Boggsone said...

Perhaps the County should formulate a Voting Board? I'm sure the intense overinflated ego of Ron Neil would make him an excellent "Civilian Chair" of the Board. Nystrom could be his recording secretary flunky!

el grillo said...

One of the problems of curbside recycling in the beginning was the notion that Joe Sixpak would do some "source separation". The current Recycling Center by the Industrial Incubator only requires the separation of Banners, Reminders, and other newspapers from other "Comingled Recyclables". This allows those who don't read to put all their "recyclables" in one container.
This concept of discriminating against those who can read seems to be pervasive in our culture. Perhaps it comes from a fear that some of us have noticed the absence of the word "God" in the U.S.Constitution, etc.
While I live only blocks from a polling booth and have no problem doing my homework prior to getting there, I find it amusing to vote by Absentee Ballot. Not only am I an elitist for actually showing up to vote in every election, but I am a bit of a snob for my preference to vote without standing in line behind the unwashed masses.
Back in 1984 it was not necessary to leave one's domicile to receive the "whole truth". It was delivered electronically and recycled if it was offensive. Where have we gone astray? What is it with allowing the media to portray secret CIA prisons as unfriendly places? Obviously only non-Christians are guilty of War Crimes, so why do we need to sign on to International Courts? People who don't have personal computers in their homes should not be allowed to participate with the rest of us. I suspected that we would get blogged down in Afghanistan. That's the area where the Taliban raise gorgeous Oriental Poppies to decorate the capitol city of Kabul where the Americans are in control nearly every day.
But I digress.

agnosticrat said...

I've always found it amusing that the one place on election day where politics are not discussed is in the line at the polling place.
You can see signs, and hear pundits discuss it on the radio in your car all the way to and from uncle sam's suggestion box.
Being in that line has always given me more opportunity to smile than a parade, or summerfest celebration.
The acknowledging nod of the head from others while waiting your turn to give democracy another whirl, tries to convey that we are all in this together, and I appreciate that you care enough to show up.
While I have never had the occasion to request an absentee ballot, I have a hard time believing that it envokes the same emotion as looking into the eyes of the guy next to you knowing that you are about to either affirm, or overrule his opinion.
Of course I already know how it will effect his vote! I saw the jesus fish on his car. I heard Hannity on his radio as he pulled in.
I smile, and hand him a pencil.

Jay said...

Agnosti--

If you live in one of Tom Wing's Townships, you may have had to trip over his yard signs to get to the township hall. It used to be candidates would stand outside the polling place (far enough not to violate state law) handing out pencils. Some used to stand on busy street corners on election day with their sign sto encourage people to vote. In fact, Tom Evans did just that in Middleville.

The subtle art of election day Get-out-the-vote is lost. Maybe if those that lost by close margins in the area employed these tactics, they may have won their races.

Another disappearing institution was the community gathering at the polls. Many townships have stopped serving pastry and coffee (which encouraged visiting). You used to be able to keep up on happenings with your neighbors on election day, but lately, what was once a community exercise has become a sanitized chore. Sigh

agnosticrat said...

How would free shots of whiskey be any different, than a chance at a million dollars, or doughnuts and coffee? Either way you are trying to buy a democracy.
Why is it so hard to accept that the reason people don't vote is because they don't care? It is a shot to the great ego of the country, but the sooner we realize that fact the sooner we can get on with the business at hand. Maybe some day something will happen to reverse the trend, but after something like 911, and a failed Iraq policy, if we don't see any proof that apathy has reversed, we must accept what is happening.
Those that don't have a want to be informed, and to vote, are informal anarchists, and in my opinion unwelcome in this democracy. The beauty is we don't even have to throw them out, they comply so willingly, and they can just as easily be redeemed to the democracy by choosing otherwise.
As for keeping up with your neighbors is concerned, try walking to their door, and saying hi.

el grillo said...

"Informal Anarchists"? I love it!
It does sort of imply having an opinion, but suggests a certain lack of commitment to it. Perhaps an informal anarchist would accept the existence of a government as long as it only exists in casual conversation.
Another thought would be a virtual government that doesn't really exist except in ones imagination and on the computer screen (or TV). A government that seems to be a game that has no point and everybody has to pay to play.
Will there be a Convention of the Informal Anarchy Party, or could I join by merely attending either of the others, or both. Come to think of it, it won't be required to show up to play!