Saturday, September 13, 2008

In 100 words or less...

The Michigan Supreme Court defied the will of the people. Justices Taylor, Corrigan and Young agreed with the Court of Appeals while Justices Markman, Cavanaugh and Weaver said the the proposal was too complex to distill into 100 words or less. The disgusting decision ignores that complex issues are constantly distilled into short summaries, from history class (The Civil War was primarily a war over the right to own slaves but also one of state rights versus centralized federal government) to literature (Romeo and Juliet is the tale of two star-crossed lovers from warring families who engage in a doomed romance).

By the way, just for the fun of it I made the above paragraph exactly 100 words. Because of the Court of Appeals decision to create an absurd rational (which could in theory be used to strike down any ballot proposal in the future) to overturn the will of 415,000 valid signatures from Michigan voters partly based on the law of a completely different state, we now have to hold our breath and wait for the glorious Constitutional Convention we've been promised would come and save us from ourselves.

The Con Con (a double con, so to speak) will be made up of the very people who would have been negatively affected by the Reform Michigan Government Now initiative, just as the courts who struck it down were as well, so it would take a real dunce to expect real reform. What we will likely get is a couple of bones thrown out to keep the wolves at bay and the assembled brain trust will go back to their day jobs, continuing to ruin state government and put up road blocks in the way of progress in Michigan.

The politicians and special interests will manage to kick the can a little farther down the road, but the people of this state and this nation are slowly waking up to the destruction done to our democracy by the wealthy elite. Michigan government is dominated by the Mackinac Center's ruling class and the Michigan Chamber of Commerce which screws its own small business members by supporting policies that help China and Wal-Mart while destroying Main Street and small towns. The Republican Party will continue it's quest to dismantle any form of social safety net, public education, sensible health care reform that doesn't line the pockets of insurance companies and will continue to blame the Democrats for it.

The 70% of people of voters who said they would approve the Reform Michigan Government Now proposal should do well to remember exactly who stood in the way of letting them vote on this and understand why they did it. History has proven that when the people want change, the ruling class will do whatever it takes to stop them. It says something that the Michigan Chamber of Commerce fought so hard to prevent a series of reforms which had NOTHING to do with "small business" or economic policies. It says something that the corporate-owned media of Michigan relentlessly repeated Saul Anuzis' lies and spin. It says something that the powers-that-be could not let a reform effort backed by nearly half a million voters even get to the ballot. It says something, and it doesn't even take 100 words- Michigan voters are demanding change the politicians and power brokers who stand in their way will soon face their wrath.

One last note to the media: From now on, will you follow the same standard with every other reform proposal and allege that you know who wrote and funded it even when you don't? Will you dismiss any ballot measure because it comes from somewhere other than exactly down the middle of the road? Will you actively work to destroy any ballot measure than either side of the political spectrum alleges will favor the other?

13 comments:

The Last Boy Scout said...

Rome wasn't built in a day and Michigans Government can't be reformed in a day. But, this proposal wasn't about Reform it was about control. This proposal would have given the Democrats an unfair advantage, and I thought the Democrats were all about fairness!

Pol Watcher said...

Do you think Democrats in Lansing would really give up control over redistricting? Democrats earned more votes for State Senate and would have controlled the chamber after '06 had it not been for pro-GOP gerrymandering. Why would Democrats give up the chance to redistrict themeselves back into control of the Senate in 2010 if this was all about power? Do you have any facts other than your talking points?

Getting rid of the least experienced member of the Supreme Court is not sole proof of a bias in the reform package- you'll have to do better than that!

el grillo said...

If you want to perpetuate "business as usual" you fit the classical definition of a "conservative".

If you want to avoid thinking, you demonize and generalize. Then you create fear and anxiety among the sheep and they bleat.

Offering a positive alternative of even the tiniest change sends them headlong over the cliff like lemmings.

What I don't understand about RMGN is why, knowing the above to be true, they would offer anything other than warmed over pablum or formula in a nippled container to those who suck.

Unless the fear-struck Republicans see our current horse-and-buggy system of state government as perfect in every way, I would expect them to show leadership for the change that they pretend to support. Reform? Not likely! Baaah!

dispachchuck said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
The Last Boy Scout said...

I sorry that you believe changing the make up of the Supreme Court is not a big deal. I do! I didn't say I was against all the components of Reform Michigan, hence the "Rome wasn't built in a day" comment. When the choice is all or nothing I'll take the nothing. Split it up and I'll vote for what I like and against what I don't.

agnosticrat said...

I agree with Pol. It is far too easy to see who stands in the way of the citizens quest for responsive government.
Once again the Republican party has done away with responsible and well thought out propositions that would help cut the cost of government.
Shrinking government to them is just a bumper sticker brought out every four years in order to set hopes high for their constituents. All the time knowing full well that if reform was to really happen they would loose their meal ticket.

Jay said...

...pro GOP "gerrymandering" of the State Senate. That is rich. All districts were set according to the bipartisan Apol standards . It was the Democrats who gave us the 24th Senate district of Allegan, Barry and Eaton. They found fewer "cuts" than what the GOP proposed. Where the GOP had leeway was in the US House districts. They went one road over in Oakland County, giving us a more Republican districts in suburban Detroit.

If you look at the articles of the time, the 2001 reapportionment was the least contentious reapportionment in decades.

agnosticrat said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
el grillo said...

There is a rumor that the Republicans are gearing up to have a Constitutional Convention announcement right after the November election.
True! Checked by Snopes!
Sounds like a great idea, except for the part about judges being appointed by the Michigan Militia.

Also, the investigation is now complete and Obama is, and always has been a "Muslim". (According to Witchapediphile: "a Muslim is a person who has a darkened skin color caused by racial intermixing. Not to be confused with the "N-word" which is not spoken from the pulpit, but means the same thing".)
True! Checked by Snopes!

"I have a lot of friends who are "Muslims", but I wouldn't want my sister to marry one" - Thomas Jeffersin

el grillo said...

Just in!
The Obama ads are mean-spirited and false!

John McCane would be happy to use e-mail but his war injuries prevent him from reading and writing.

This is not a problem because Sarah Palin is Ready to Read!

RMGN! said...

Well articulated comments, Pol.

Boy Scout, The Chamber of Commerce attorney mouthed your argument of "all or nothing" before the Supreme Court despite the fact that every ballot issue, no matter how simple or complex, is subject to an up or down vote. Take it, or leave it. That is all RMGN wanted, to let the people decide. The state courts denied you that right, and in the process, have effectively killed the people's right to petition initiative and referendum. Think about it. The Michigan Court of Appeals and the Michigan Supreme Court in collusion with the Michigan Chamber of Commerce just rewrote the constitution without a vote of the people. That in itself violates our state constitution. We are now at the total mercy of an unaccountable legislature and activist judges. Nothing can stop them now. No one will take the time nor expense of trying.

And Jay, it was again our activist Supreme Court that redrew districts AFTER a consensus was reached by Republicans and Democrats. To suggest our state districts are not gerrymandered insults the intelligence of any one that knows anything about state politics. Our redistricting was to level the playing field, making every subsequent election competitive.

Jay said...

RGMN:

Give me an example of where the court "gerrymandered" the State House or State Senate. I was in the trenches during those deliberations. The Court was a rubber stamp to both Apol divined plans.

I find it funny that you find 30 years of Democratic domination of the Court all right, but 10 years of GOP control is too much. In my eyes, it has yet to balance out.

Jay said...

I also find it amusing that the RMGN squad decried partisanship when the maverick (Weaver) and a Democratic justice (Cavenaugh) agreed with the majority.

I also love the fact that this proposal would prevent the Sec. of State, county clerks, and twp. clerks from exercising their 1st Amendment rights by not allowing them to campaign, but would allow their opponents to campaign unimpeded. Maybe RGMN's time and money would of been better spent on seeking a Constitutional convention in 2010.